Search
If you have ever downloaded an E360 report, you would have come across the below-given terms:
Have you ever wondered what these are and how they are calculated? Please follow the link for more details on what they are, and In this article, let us learn how they are calculated.
Consider we have 3 sections in a survey (S1, S2, S3) having 3, 3, and 1 opinion scale questions, respectively. And in this survey, we have 1 subject, 2 peers, 1 reportee, and 1 manager.
Overall Summary Formula
{ ( [(S1Q1ans + S1Q2ans + S1Q3ans) x managerweight] + [ ( (S1Q1ans + S1Q2ans + S1Q3ans)peer1 + (S1Q1ans + S1Q2ans + S1Q3ans)peer2 ) x peerweight ] + [ (S1Q1ans + S1Q2ans + S1Q3ans) x reporteeweight] + [ (S1Q1ans + S1Q2ans + S1Q3ans) x selfweight] ) x S1weight
+
( [(S2Q1ans + S2Q2ans + S2Q3ans) x managerweight] + [ ( (S2Q1ans + S2Q2ans + S2Q3ans)peer1 + (S2Q1ans + S2Q2ans + S2Q3ans)peer2 ) x peerweight ] + [ (S2Q1ans + S2Q2ans + S2Q3ans) x reporteeweight] + [ (S2Q1ans + S2Q2ans + S2Q3ans) x selfweight] ) x S2weight
+
( [(S3Q1ans) x managerweight] + [ ( (S3Q1ans)peer1 + (S3Q1ans)peer2 ) x peerweight ] + [ (S3Q1ans) x reporteeweight] + [ (S3Q1ans) x selfweight] ) x S3weight }
➗
{ [ (No. of questions answered by manager in S1 x managerweight x No. of managers) + (No.of questions answered by (peer1+peer2) in S1 x peerweight x No. of peers) + (No .of questions answered by reportee in S1 x reporteeweight x No. of Reportees) + (No.of questions answered by self in S1 x selfweight) ] * S1weight
+
[ (No. of questions answered by manager in S2 x managerweight x No. of managers) + (No.of questions answered by (peer1+peer2) in S2 x peerweight x No. of peers) + (No .of questions answered by reportee in S2 x reporteeweight x No. of Reportees) + (No.of questions answered by self in S2 x selfweight) ] * S2weight
+
[ (No. of questions answered by manager in S3 x managerweight x No. of managers) + (No.of questions answered by (peer1+peer2) in S3 x peerweight x No. of peers) + (No .of questions answered by reportee in S3 x reporteeweight x No. of Reportees) + (No.of questions answered by self in S3 x selfweight) ] * S3weight }
Individual Section Score Formula
{ ( [(S1Q1ans + S1Q2ans + S1Q3ans) x managerweight] + [ ( (S1Q1ans + S1Q2ans + S1Q3ans)peer1 + (S1Q1ans + S1Q2ans + S1Q3ans)peer2 ) x peerweight ] + [ (S1Q1ans + S1Q2ans + S1Q3ans) x reporteeweight] + [ (S1Q1ans + S1Q2ans + S1Q3ans) x selfweight] ) }
➗
{ [ (No. of questions answered by manager in S1 x managerweight x No. of managers) + (No.of questions answered by (peer1+peer2) in S1 x peerweight x No. of peers) + (No .of questions answered by reportee in S1 x reporteeweight x No. of Reportees) + (No.of questions answered by self in S1 x selfweight) ] }
(Note: S represents a Section/Competency)
Section 1 response:
Section 2 response:
Section 3 response:
Case 1: Consider the role and section weightages as 1:
So, according to the Overall Summary and Individual Section Score Formula
Overall Summary: 117 / 35 = 3.3
Leadership Skills: 47/15 = 3.1
Communication Skills: 53/15 = 3.5
Overall Rating: 17/5 = 3.4
Individual Evaluator Scores in a Section
This can be calculated as the average response particular evaluator.
In this case, we have two peers so we will average individual peer responses and again we will take the average of both peers.
For better understanding please refer to Section 1 response.
Leadership Skills:
Self: 9 / 3 = 3
P1 => 10 / 3 = 3.3
Peer: Here two peers are there so it is calculating each peer average => 6.333 / 2 = 3.1
P2 => 9 / 3 = 3
Reportee: 10 / 3 = 3.333
Manager: 9 / 3 = 3
Likewise, it will be calculated for the remaining sections
What if all roles club to Others expect self?
Leadership Skills:
(Peer1+Peer2) + Manager + Reportee => (6.333 + 3 + 3.333) / 4 = 12.666 / 4 = 3.2
Self: 9 / 3 = 3
Likewise, it will be calculated for the remaining sections
Case 2: Consider the role and section weightages as follows:
Section Weightage: S1 wt = 3, S2 wt = 2 , S3 wt = 4
Role Weightage: SELF=1 , PEER = 2, REPORTEE = 5, MANAGER = 2
So, according to the Overall Summary and Individual Section Score Formula
Overall Score:
767 / 228 = 3.4
Leadership Skills:
(19 x 2) + (10 x 5) + (9 x 1) + (9 x 2)
(3 x 2 x 2) + (3 x 5) + (3 x 1) + (3 x 2)
resulting in 3.2
Please reach out to us if you have any questions. We are just a chat away!
Powered By SparrowDesk